Help

What better time to start blogging here as on the day we push our 2years+ work out as GA ready.
By our work I mean JBoss Microcontainer project, MC for short name. ;-)

So, I'm happy to announce that we've finally went 2.0.0.GA with MC.

  • Reflect 2.0.2.GA
  • VFS 2.0.0.GA
  • MDR 2.0.1.GA
  • Managed 2.0.0.GA
  • Kernel 2.0.2.GA
  • ClassLoader 2.0.1.GA
  • Deployers 2.0.3.GA

And the piece that binds my blog with other Seam bloggers

All MC sub-projects are fully mavenized, hence making it super easy to use.
We're a bit behind with documentation, but we'll be happy to help you on our forums:

For some light reading / coding check my DZone article along with its demos:

JBoss people blogging about it:

Cool customizations

And for all who will be at Devoxx, come and grab me if you wanna talk about MC. ;-)

7 comments:
 
04. Dec 2008, 03:27 CET | Link

Congrats, that sounds like a really big step forward :-)

 
04. Dec 2008, 04:33 CET | Link

Thanks.

Yeah, change from 1.x to 2.x is enormous.
We've grown from a simple IoC container to a superb deployment kernel.

But we're not stopping there,
still a lot of cool features to follow. ;-)

 
05. Dec 2008, 04:57 CET | Link
Jeremy Norris | jnorris(AT)pattern73.com

How does this project relate to JBoss 5.0? It this more of a programmatic container? Is this using the same internal components as JBoss 5.0? If I were going to write some integration tests where I programmatically bring up a JEE6 artifact, for an application that is targeted for deployment on JBoss 5.0, is this suitable, or does JBoss 5.0 come with other tools that are more applicable?

 
05. Dec 2008, 14:42 CET | Link
How does this project relate to JBoss 5.0?

MC is the new JBossAS kernel - a replacement for previous JMX based Microkernel.

It this more of a programmatic container?

What do you mean by more programmatic?
Once MC is booted, you can use whatever approach you like,
metadata driven deployment (xml, annotations, direct metadata) or direct API usage.

Is this using the same internal components as JBoss 5.0?

No, MC is a standalone project (or a couple of standalone projects),
it's JBoss5 that heavily uses them.

If I were going to write some integration tests where I programmatically bring up a JEE6 artifact, for an application that is targeted for deployment on JBoss 5.0, is this suitable, or does JBoss 5.0 come with other tools that are more applicable?

I would say it is suitable. There is an effort to use MC as Embeddable server / test environment - check our forums for more detilas.
For a simple MC bootstrap I suggest you look at my MC demos project - the link is in my blog post.
You can extend that idea to suite your needs, perhaps having a peek at how we do more complex bootstrap in JBossAS.

 
06. Dec 2008, 03:13 CET | Link
Jeremy Norris | jnorris(AT)pattern73.com

Thanks, that's very helpful. This project looks really great.

04. Dec 2014, 08:31 CET | Link

Logos is that the creator's utilization of confirmation to keep a duplicate an essential case. you'll have the capacity to look at the creator's utilization of trustworthy sources to keep a duplicate his perspectives and best-write-my-essay.com, still in light of the fact that the methodology each of his points of interest unfold inside the half.

 
15. Dec 2014, 11:07 CET | Link
costi partita iva | justinssadamss(AT)gmail.com

Regole che ha che cosa e non può essere applicata per l'imposta di riscatto e costi partita iva, una volta si tratta di divertimento e regali yuletide per i lavoratori o clienti è incredibilmente ambigua e di rado alcuni proprietari di casa casa d'affari non percepiscono le condizioni sui principi. abbiamo ordinato giù una guida semplice che copre quello che si preferisce prendere, e congiuntamente gli elementi per guardare fuori!