In Relation To

Matt Raible lists his picks of the top web frameworks for deploying on the JVM:

So, I've been following this discussion with interest. I'm still confused. All I'm really getting out of the comments on this thread is: there's some other objects in the system that aren't DAOs or entities. But I knew that already. Clearly, I need to actually read the damn book for myself. Still, it really doesn't fill me with confidence that people who /have/ read the book don't seem to be able to explain (in words or code) the Repository notion coherently. And it looks like everyone has their own private take on what exactly a Repository is all about. This gives me a hint that the idea is not especially well-defined.

Well, this post really brought out the crazies. Folks told me that I don't know what an object is, called me ignorant twice, quoted Alan Kay at me, and accused me of being a C programmer. :-)

Kinda tangentially related to this discussion, I'm often asked whether I believe in rich domain models or anemic domain models. I guess I'm pretty much ignorant as to what these terms really mean, since I've never seen a proper definition of either term.

Somehow, this silliness got linked by InfoQ. It's not really worth the effort of fisking this post, but I'm bored so I'll go ahead and do it anyway.

Seam 2.0 was released this morning, after 8 months in development!

InfoQ asked me a few questions about Seam 2.0 and Web Beans a few weeks back. They've just posted the article here.

This post summarizes a complaint about JSF that I hear from time to time:

The theme of Web Beans is:

The JCP folks seem to have resolved their technical problems, and the Web Beans EDR is now available at jcp.org. We've had some great feedback on the comments alias already. Please keep it coming!